Showing posts with label protection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label protection. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

What is happening to Intellectual Property law in this country?

The last couple of months have seen interesting developments in Intellectual Property (IP) law. The Combatting Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) made it through Committee in the Senate. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is being used to enforce IP law by the Department of Justice (DOJ). Internet domains are taken down with no warning to disrupt the sale of counterfeit goods. According to the press release from the DOJ:

The coordinated federal law enforcement operation targeted online retailers of a diverse array of counterfeit goods, including sports equipment, shoes, handbags, athletic apparel and sunglasses as well as illegal copies of copyrighted DVD boxed sets, music and software.

Makes sense and seems reasonable. But they seized at least one search engine that never hosted torrents or knock-off items. That is disturbing. What would happen if DHS suddenly decided to seize Google? Bing? You can find torrents and knock-offs on those sites, too. Shutting down a search engine because you can find pirated movies is like shutting down a library because you can find the formula for TNT.

Historically IP crimes have been civil matters. But recently they have begun to be pressed as criminal offenses. Take a case reported by Wired.com, the case of Matthew Crippen. Crippen is charged with two counts of circumventing DRM on XBox video consoles by installing mod chips that allowed people to run homegrown software, RIPped DVD's, and other 'unofficial' content, although he could have been charged with many more counts. His lawyers are trying to use the recent decision granting jail-breaking the iPhone an exemption under fair use as part of their defense strategy. If they lose he's facing 3 years in jail, although it could have been as long as 10 years.

Why is the Department of Homeland security enforcing copyright law? Why are IP cases being tried as criminal cases? Why are we changing our IP suspects guilty until proven innocent? How can we fix these problems?

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Religiously filtering search

Habiba Nosheen on NPR did an interesting story yesterday on a new trend in internet search. The internet is a wide open medium. There are few, if any, limits on what can be published to the web. That is a blessing because we can find information on almost any subject by typing a few key words in a search engine. It is a curse because often we will get information we never intended - and may not have wanted. Sometimes we get information that's downright repulsive or directly counter to our beliefs. Now there are search engines that cater to groups, specifically religious groups, by filtering out content that does not conform to the religious belief system. There are sites for Jews, Muslims and Christians

This is an interesting development, and perhaps an obvious evolution from filtered content. Filtered search is similar to filtered content, but more flexible. When you subscribe to a filtered content provider you can search using any search engine, but may not be able to access all of the results that come up. With filtered search you will be able to access any link in the results, and if you either don't get the result you were expecting or think you're missing something you can go to a traditional search engine and access any result that pops up.

The article names three faith-centric search engines:

seekfind is a Christian search engine that appears to run it's own indexes.

jewogle is a Jewish search engine powered by Google.

I'mHalal is an Islamic search engine that also appears to do it's own indexing. I like that it has general web search, news search, and Qur'an search.

Filtered search engines using religious guidelines is a pretty neat idea. They allow people to get online who might not be able to take advantage of the World Wide Web without the protection filtering provides, but don't limit greater access if it is needed.

I wonder how well the Christian search engine conforms to the idea of being in the world but not of it? But I wonder the same thing about Christian bookstores, movies, and other "Christian" things that isolate us from the world we're supposed to be "salt and light" to.